Archive for July, 2010

Open source ‘reduces risk,’ federal agency’s CIO s

Friday, July 30th, 2010

Not having sunk costs in a commercial software program also means the agency can move to a new program more quickly should its needs change. The general openness also means the agency could become a collaborator in the further development of the software itself.

The GSA, by the way, is no small fry. It manages more than one-fourth of the federal government’s total procurement dollars and influences the management of $500 billion in federal assets.

commentary

Coleman cited some excellent reasons for deploying open-source software:

Casey Coleman, chief information officer for the U.S. General Services Administration, said in a speech this week that the GSA heavily relies on open source to drive down costs, increase flexibility of IT dollars, and reduce risk.

“You get much more transparency and interoperability, and that reduces your risk,” she said.

By using open source, the agency won’t be locked in to using a proprietary software program, at least for the duration of the contract.

When the GSA, the organization that influences the purchasing for the rest of the U.S. federal government, buys heavily into open source, you know it’s time for the rest of the government to do so, as well. In fact, it already is–at least, 55 percent of it.

Ms. Coleman, I want my tax dollars to stretch a bit further, though. Please instruct the rest of the government to buy into open source much more actively. Thanks!

The agency uses a laundry list of great open-source software–initially for its information systems but also increasingly for transactional mission-critical systems–such as JBoss, Linux (Red Hat), Bugzilla (bug tracking), JUnit (testing), JMeter (Apache performance monitoring tool), Eclipse, KnowledgeTree (content management), and others.

Lycos non-launches Webon site building service

Friday, July 30th, 2010

Not that anyone is asking for a site builder these days. There are blogging platforms, social site builders, and social networks. Who actually builds a straight-up Web site anymore?

Webon builds straightforward sites, like this one for a vacation rental.

Also new: Lycos Cinema.

But if you do want to build just a site, try this service. There are basic templates for building photo sites, travelogues, wedding sites, or even just blogs (although: why?). Or you can start from scratch. In each template there is a decent collection of site themes.

Future capabilities may include video hosting and support for multiple authors, as well as more social features (OpenSocial widget support, I’d wager).

No press release, no fanfare, not even a PowerPoint for the asking: Lycos has just launched Webon, a free site-building service that’s solid, simple, and very usable.

Online site editors don't get much simpler.

Editing Webon sites is very easy: You just click on the boilerplate text and start typing. You can also insert a few different widgets, add new pages, navigation elements, and or your own HTML code. The editing functions are very smooth. Even uploading images is a snap, thanks to desktop uploaders for Vista, iPhoto, and Picasa.

All free Webon sites live at sitename.webonsites.com. If you want to use a custom domain, $8.95 a month will get it for you, as well as more storage space for photos.

Webon feels like a solid, Web 2.0 implementation of a Web 1.0 idea. But if all you need is a simple site without about all those bubbly new concepts clouding your experience, you could do a lot worse.

Google expands offline calendar to more users

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

(Via Google Operating System.)

(Credit:
Screenshot by Stephen Shankland/CNET)

(Credit:
Screenshot by Stephen Shankland/CNET)

Clicking the Offline Beta link gets the installation started.

(Credit:
Screenshot by Stephen Shankland/CNET)

(Credit:
Screenshot by Stephen Shankland/CNET)

Once installed, Google Calendar synchronizes its locally stored data with that on the Web site.

Offline Gmail is available only in some English-speaking countries; it wasn’t immediately clear how widespread offline Gmail Calendar access is.

The feature is available by clicking the “Offline Beta” link in the upper right side of the page. Clicking on it walks the user through an installation and initial synchronization process.

As with offline Gmail, the service uses Google’s Gears software to store a copy of the calendar data on a person’s computer so it can accessed while the network is down. Unlike the Gmail version, new items can’t be created or modified while offline.

When Google announced that Google Calendar users could read events even while not connected to a network, the feature was only for organizations using Google Apps for their Internet domains. Now the offline calendar feature can be used more broadly, though.

Google Calendar's offline features relies on Google's open-source Gears software.

Google explains what offline Google Calendar enables during the installation.

Searching for ways to improve Office

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

In an interview, Pratley said Office Labs is designed to try out anything from just a feature to an entire new product concept. The goal is to get feedback early on, before deciding where to put the big development dollars.

“We’re trying to be really upfront about the fact that we are doing that (tracking), and that (getting the feedback) is the only reason these things are available,” Pratley said.

Chris Pratley, who helped lead the development of Microsoft's OneNote, now leads the Office Labs effort.

Office Labs is not the first time Microsoft has tried to create a sandbox for new ideas. It already has its “Live Labs,” which has served as an incubator for the online services business.

Just because something seems like a good idea, doesn’t mean users will jump on it. Pratley notes that in the 1990s, Microsoft experimented with–but never released–a Web browser-like approach to navigating for commands, offering hyperlinks to different dialog boxes.

“It’s kind of expensive to make an entire product and then put it out there and see if it’s any good,” he said. Pratley knows firsthand. He was among those who helped create the Office OneNote application earlier this decade after spending the 1990s working on Word and Excel.

For those who have trouble finding their old commands in Office’s new Ribbon interface, Microsoft has a new option: search for it.

“It was pretty clear people were uncomfortable not knowing where things were,” Pratley said.

Search Commands, also known by the code name “Scout,” has been popular inside Redmond for some time. With Office Labs, Microsoft will get to see if the searching metaphor is a hit with average users.

“A lot of times that means that we won’t end up coding them into a product because they weren’t as good as we thought,” he said.

A note on the Office Labs Web site warns that usage of the products downloaded from the site will be tracked.

Rather, it will be available via a new effort, dubbed Office Labs. Spearheaded by Microsoft veteran Chris Pratley, Office Labs is Microsoft’s attempt to test out productivity ideas that may–or may not–be ready for prime time.

On Monday, the company is releasing an Office add-on called Search Commands that lets users type the function they are looking to do. After months of testing it internally, Microsoft is ready to give the public a chance to try it out. But the new tool won’t be found on Microsoft’s main Web site.

With Search Commands, though, the commands still have a home–the user just doesn’t have to remember where that is. Microsoft is still weighing an option that lets users see where the command they are searching for “really lives” as well as a way to add it to their main toolbar for easy access.

(Credit:
Microsoft )

In that approach, though, commands didn’t have a fixed home, but instead could be accessed in any number of ways. That uncertainty didn’t sit well with users.

(Credit:
Microsoft)

The goal, he said, is to figure out which ideas are actually worth pursuing.

In contrast to the masses of developers who work on Office itself, Pratley leads a team of about 60 designers and developers. On Monday, Microsoft is going public with two of the group’s projects–Search Commands and Community Clips, which is basically an attempt to create a YouTube for help videos.

Office Labs is working on about 10 or so ideas, Pratley said, but the remainder are either in the planning stages or only being tested internally.

For the ones that do see light of day, he said the goal is to get as much feedback as possible. In that vein, Microsoft tells users that it will be collecting information on how they use the Office Labs code. So those who don’t like being tracked might want to forgo using their offerings.

Comcast launches faster Internet plans, but usage

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Cost aside, what may be the most controversial aspect of this speed bump is that subscribers of the residential plans will get no higher cap over the 250GB monthly limit which was instated earlier this October. Comcast’s own release prides the new Extreme plan on letting customers “download a high-def movie (6 GB) in about 16 minutes, a standard-def movie (2 GB) in about 5 minutes and a standard-def TV show (300 MB) in a matter of seconds.” Do the math and you’ll see that an extreme subscriber could easily blow past the 250 GB cap in a matter of hours.

The two new plans, dubbed “Extreme” and “Ultra” clock in at 50 and 22 Mbps of downstream respectively and 10 and 5 Mbps of upstream. Comparatively, customers of Comcast’s “performance” plans are getting a big jump from 8 to 16 Mbps on the downspeed, however, upload performance remains at 2 Mbps.

Comcast’s PR representative Charlie Douglas tells me the cap will remain in place for residential customers, although for right now business customers are free to go over that. Any potential residential customers who think they may go over, the slightly more expensive business tiers might offer a safe haven from having your heavy bandwidth habit limited.

So quickly–to sum up the new and updated plans:

Communications provider Comcast on Wednesday announced two new tiers of service for heavy residential downloaders, along with speed upgrades for subscribers of its existing services.

Alongside these residential tiers, Comcast is also introducing a new business tier called “Premium,” which comes in at 22/5 Mbps down/up for $99.95 a month, as well as beefing up its Deluxe tier to match the Ultra plan at 50/10 Mbps down/up for $189.95 a month. Meanwhile, the “Starter” business tier has received a similar speed bump to that of the residential plans, moving from 6 to 12 Mbps.

Business services
Deluxe 50 (50/10 Mbps down/up) - $189.95/month
(new) Premium (22/5 Mbps down/up) - $99.95/month
Starter (12/2 Mbps down/up) - Price unknown

The speed bumps, which are being rolled out to 10 major markets between now and next year come at a cost. The somewhat confusingly named Extreme and Ultra tiers come in at $139.95 and $62.95 a month, amounting to an annual cost close to $1,700 a year for subscribers of the Extreme–nearly three times that of Comcast’s standard monthly residential service.

Residential services
(new) Extreme 50 (50/10 Mbps down/up) - $139.95/month
(new) Ultra (22/5 Mbps down/up) - $62.95/month
Performance Plus (16/2 Mbps down/up) $52.95/month
Performance (12/2 Mbps down/up) - $42.95/month

Rocky Mountain High Denver’s high-end audio fest

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Jolida’s new $399 JT-10 all-tube integrated amplifier sounded awesome. It’s a gorgeous glass encased design, a little jewel of an amp. Jolida also showed the JD 9 tube phono preamplifier, which was also sounding phenomenal. I believe it’s $450, what a deal!

High price is no guarantee of ultimate sound quality, but the very best performers are never cheap. The best sound I heard, by far, came from the Focal Grande Utopia EM speakers ($180,000 per pair). The speaker boasts several breakthroughs; check Focal’s Web site to learn more. KEF’s reigning statement speaker debuted last year at $140,000, but the Muon now runs $165,000 a pair. Aren’t you kicking yourself?

Turntable manufacturer Thorens has been around for 125 years, predating consumer audio by a long shot. Its new TD 160 HD boasts a number of breakthroughs and goes for $899, but the brand offers a vast range of more affordable models.

The KEF Muon super speaker.

Vacuum tube electronics were plentiful, perhaps even in the majority compared with solid-state. Sure, a lot of gear was pricey, but budget high-end brands, such as Audioengine were making great sound on the cheap, the Audioengine 2 speakers run $200 a pair. Clever name, the Audiophile One is a tiny, $249, 30 watts per channel stereo amplifier. It’s no toy, the little thing comes in a bunch of colors and it’s built to a very high standard.

UPDATE: Click here to view more pictures from the RMAF.

High-end audio is a smaller industry, where established brands such as Krell and Vandersteen compete against fledgling start-ups. Every manufacturer sets out to build the very best performing products, without the dulling constraints that Sony or Bose has to contend with.

(Credit:
Steve Guttenberg)

The hundreds of manufacturers participating at the show proves high-end audio is alive and definitely kicking. RMAF has a very different vibe than the Consumer Electronics Show held in Las Vegas every January–RMAF is friendlier, without a hint of corporate oppression that dominates mainstream shows.

Cruising through the 160 demo rooms I noticed an interesting trend, a minority of companies were using CD players. Maybe half had music servers/laptops, 30 percent were spinning vinyl, a couple had reel-to-reel analog tape machines, and the remainder was CD based.

RMAF will return to Denver next October, and I’ll be there. Hope you can stop by and see and hear the show for yourself.

The Rocky Mountain Audio Fest 2008 was held at two hotels: the Denver Marriott Tech Center Hotel and the Hyatt Regency Tech Center on October 10 through October 12, 2008.

TweetValue estimates your Twitter profile’s worth

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Twitter Grader seems to offer a better service than TweetValue, in terms of comparing Twitter users, offering breakdowns by location and specific information on how your score is calculated. I really don’t see a need in the market for TweetValue, when a site like Twitter Grader offers better tools for comparing users and a score that can actually be explained. Everyone likes to see how they compare in a given area every once in awhile, but there is no need for the absurd number of Twitter ranking sites that we are seeing pop up right now. Please, no more!

(Credit: TweetValue)

Call me skeptical, but it isn’t really apparent that the figures are based on any actual factual valuation of Twitter profiles. Rather, it appears to just be another rank to see how Twitterers stack up against one another. I’m not just saying this because my Twitter account’s value is a sorry $125. Rather, I actually believe that there is little to no real basis for this dollar figure. The number would be just as significant if the dollar sign were dropped.

Following the controversy surrounding Twitterank, TweetValue assigns a dollar value to your Twitter profile. While the site does not disclose how this value is calculated, it does give a message that reads, “The value is calculated with a Ph.D. algorithm that is based on the public information available on your Twitter profile.”

It's a little discouraging to hear that the Twitter account you worked so hard to build is worth $125.

I was pointed toward a new Twitter ranking tool by Louis Gray. The tool of the day is TweetValue.

Slide adds CBS, Comcast, Time Warner to its friend

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

While Slide’s early ventures might have been modest, it’s never been lacking in Silicon Valley starpower. It was launched in 2005 by PayPal co-founder Max Levchin, and is backed by Khosla Ventures.

The video service, called FunSpace Channels, will reportedly include shows from CBS, Comcast’s E! Entertainment channel, NBC, Time Warner’s Warner Bros., and other media companies. Slide will recommend videos based on how often they are forwarded by others. Slide will either sell ads against the videos, or take a cut of the ads sold by the content owners, the article said.

CNET News is published by CBS Interactive, a unit of CBS.

Now the company is expanding its reach to include somewhat more sophisticated media. On Thursday, it plans to announce deals with several major media companies that would allow people to view clips of popular TV shows on social-networking sites, according to the Journal.

Slide, the start-up that brought sheep-flinging to the social-networking world, has inked deals with several major content companies, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.

San Francisco-based Slide makes software tools that let people add some personalization–in the form of slideshows, guestbooks, skins, or virtual pets–to their pages on all the major social networks.

EIC Squared Chrome, iPods, and a Dell-Salesforce

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

On this week’s EIC Squared podcast ZDNet’s Larry Dignan and I discuss Google’s latest disruption in the Web 2.0 field, the Chrome browser, as well as Apple’s product launch event on September 9. In addition, Larry explains his idea that Dell and Salesforce.com could merge. Dell is trying to be more of a software company and is using the Force.com platform, and Salesforce.com is a major Dell customer. But, it’s unclear how Salesforce.com, its shareholders and customers, would hugely benefit from a union.

The Dimdim opportunity

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

commentary

It’s good to see TechCrunch picking up on Dimdim’s launch of its hosted Web-conferencing solution. But I think it misses the main driver of Dimdim’s opportunity:

No, it actually makes the most sense for manufacturers that are looking to embed Web conferencing into other solutions. The same is true for Ringside Networks. Arguably, we didn’t need another Web conferencing solution (Dimdim) or social-networking platform (Ringside).

The open-source strategy followed by Dimdim makes most sense when customers want to manage the software on-premise, and it’s not so important when everything’s hosted in the cloud. But it’s good to see competition nipping at the heals of giant WebEx.

What we do need are such platforms that can be expanded and integrated into other solutions. Open-source solutions that remain islands, developed and deployed by one company, are much less interesting than open-source solutions that are developed and deployed by a community. Community provides the opportunity for Dimdim.

In short, Dimdim isn’t cool because it’s open-source Web conferencing. It’s cool because of what open-source Web conferencing allows technology providers to do with Web conferencing that price and proprietary licensing hitherto precluded.